15 destinations identified for development under Ramayana Circuit

New Delhi: The Government of India has identified 15 sites under the Development of Ayodhya –Ramayana Circuit theme in Uttar Pradesh (2017-18) and has sanctioned Rs 133.31 crores for the mega project.

Ramayana Circuit is one of the fifteen thematic circuits identified for development under the Swadesh Darshan scheme of Ministry of Tourism.

The Ministry has initially identified fifteen destinations for development under the Ramayana Circuit theme namely Ayodhya, Nandigram, Shringverpur & Chitrakoot (Uttar Pradesh), Sitamarhi, Buxar & Darbhanga (Bihar), Chitrakoot (Madhya Pradesh), Mahendragiri (Odisha), Jagdalpur (Chattisgarh), Nashik & Nagpur (Maharashtra), Bhadrachalam (Telangana), Hampi (Karnataka) and Rameshwaram (Tamil Nadu).

The other project is Development of Wayside Amenities in Buddhist Circuit and Ramayana Circuit: Varanasi-Gaya; Lucknow-Ayodhya- Lucknow; Gorakhpur-Kushinagar; Kushinagar-Gaya- Kushinagar (2018-19).

For the state of Chhattisgarh, the Ministry has sanctioned the project for Development of Tribal Tourism Circuit in Jashpur- Kunkuri- Mainpat- Ambikapur- Maheshpur -Ratanpur- Kurdar-Sarodadadar- Gangrel- Kondagaon– Nathiya Nawagaon- Jagdalpur- Chitrakoot- Tirthgarh in the year 2015-16 with a total sanction amount of Rs.99.21 crore.

Previous 1,151 Nutritional Rehabilitation Centres For Malnourished Children
Next Unilever To Acquire Horlicks, Other Consumer Healthcare Nutrition Products
About the author


1 Comment

  1. September 28, 2019

    Throughout the grand scheme of things you’ll get a B+ for hard work. Exactly where you actually misplaced everybody was first in all the details. You know, as the maxim goes, details make or break the argument.. And it could not be more true at this point. Having said that, let me say to you just what exactly did do the job. The article (parts of it) is definitely very convincing which is probably the reason why I am taking the effort to comment. I do not really make it a regular habit of doing that. Secondly, although I can certainly see the leaps in reason you come up with, I am not necessarily convinced of how you seem to unite the ideas which inturn help to make the conclusion. For the moment I shall subscribe to your issue however hope in the future you link your dots much better.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *